1. Siu B.W., Afzaal M., Aldayel, H.S., A corpus-based comparison of linguistic markers of stance and genre in the academic writing of novice and advanced engineering learners, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1) (2024) 284. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-02757-4
2. Strauss S., Feiz P., Discourse Analysis: Putting Our Worlds into Words, Routledge, New York, 2013. DOI: 10.4324/9780203121559
3. Zheltova E.V., Faxo in Plautus Revisited: Causativity vs. Speaker’s Stance, Philologia Classica, 17 (1) (2022) 77–84. DOI: 10.21638/spbu20.2022.106
4. Habibova K., Corpus linguistics and concordance: methodological approaches and new applications, Linguistic Researches, 1 (2025) 89–95. DOI: 10.59849/2664-5432.2025.1.89
5. Hyland K., Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing, 2nd ed., Bloomsbury Academic, London, 2019.
6. Hyland K., Writing with attitude: Conveying a stance in academic texts, Teaching Grammar To Speakers Of Other Languages, ed. by E. Hinkel, Routledge, New York, 2016, pp. 246–265. DOI: 10.4324/9781315695273
7. Martin J.R., White P.R.R., The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2005. DOI: 10.1057/9780230511910
8. Utkina T.I., Kostareva E.V., Features of Metadiscourse Use (Sphere of Economics, Students’ Written Texts in English), Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 74 (2021) 188–207. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/74/11
9. Hyland K., Jiang F., Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance, Written Communication, 33 (3) (2016) 251–274. DOI: 10.1177/0741088316650399
10. Hyland K., Milton J., Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 6 (2) (1997) 183–205. DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3
11. Nesi H., Gardner S., Genres across the Disciplines: Student writing in higher education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012. DOI: 10.1017/9781009030199
12. Römer-Barron U., Swales J.M., The Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP), Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (3) (2010) 249–249. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.04.002
13. Pearson W.S., Abdollahzadeh E., Metadiscourse in academic writing: A systematic review, Lingua, 293 (2023) 103561. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103561
14. Ädel A., Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 2006, pp. 69–97. DOI: 10.1075/scl.24
15. Mauranen A., Exploring ELF: Academic English shaped by non-native speakers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
16. Canagarajah S., Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations, Routledge, London, 2012. DOI: 10.4324/9780203073889
17. Vassileva I., Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing, English for Specific Purposes, 20 (1) (2001) 83–102. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0
18. Dontcheva-Navratilova O., Cross-Cultural Variation in the Use of Hedges and Boosters in Academic Discourse, Prague Journal of English Studies, 5 (1) (2016) 163–184. DOI: 10.1515/pjes-2016-0009
19. Hinkel E., Hedging, Inflating, and Persuading in L2 Academic Writing, Applied Language Learning, 15 (1–2) (2005) 29–53.
20. Lee J.J., Subtirelu N.C., Metadiscourse and disciplinary identity in L2 writing, Journal of Eng-lish for Academic Purposes, 20 (2015) 47–58.
21. Dahl T., Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline?, Journal of Pragmatics, 36 (10) (2004) 1807–1825. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004
22. Dugalich N.M., Han H., Certainty Stance Adverbs in Chinese Linguistic Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Study, RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 15 (1) (2024) 248–261. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2024-15-1-248-261
23. Aull L., Linguistic Markers of Stance and Genre in Upper-Level Student Writing, Written Communication, 36 (2) (2022) 267–295. DOI: 10.1177/0741088318819472
24. Serova O.U., An automated study of translationese indicators in scientific paper translations, Terra Linguistica, 16 (1) (2025) 61–81. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.16105
25. Dalaf M., Exploring Iraqi EFL college students’ idiomatic awareness and use, Journal of Ishraqat Tanmawya, 24 (2022) 1–18.
26. Chen S., A corpus-based study of stance markers in academic thesis writing by L2 undergradu-ates, Acta Psychologica, 259 (2025) 105333. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105333
27. Klochkova Ye.S., Evaluation strategies in open peer-review: Polarity of evaluation and representational variability, Terra Linguistica, 16 (2) (2025) 56–70. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.16204
28. Gurova E.A., Politeness markers venligst, gerne and please in the Danish language, Terra Linguistica, 15(4) (2024) 52–66. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.15404
29. Əliyeva N., Heydərov R., Korpus dilçiliyinin təşkilində leksikoqrafiyanın rolu və vəzifələri [The role and tasks of lexicography in the organization of Corpus Linguistics], Ümummilli lider Heydər Əliyevin 100 illik yubileyinə və Beynəlxalq Ana dili gününə həsr olunmuş Azərbaycan dilinin İKT problemləri, İKT-nin Azərbaycan dili problemləri respublika elmi-praktiki konfransının materialları, 21–22 fevral 2023 [Materials of the Republican scientific-practical conference on ICT problems of the Azerbaijani language, problems of the Azerbaijani language of ICT, dedicated to the 100th anniversary of national leader Heydar Aliyev and the International Mother Language Day], Baku, 2023, pp. 200–204 .
30. Habibova K.A., Machine Metaphorics in Techno-Modern Texts, Terra Linguistica, 16 (4) (2025) 128–140. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.16408
31. Shubina E.L., Sedova A.V., Hedge Euphemisms as Tools of Economic Discourse, Nauchnyi dialog, 11 (2021) 183–200. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2021-11-183-200
32. Boginskaya O.A., Functional categories of hedges: A diachronic study of Russian research arti-cle abstracts, Russian Journal of Linguistics, 26 (3) (2022) 645–667. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-30017
33. Habibova K.A., The Specificity of Everyday Discourses, Proceedings of First International Volga Region Conference on Economics, Humanities and Sports (FICEHS 2019), Atlantis Press. 2020, pp. 335–340. DOI: 10.2991/aebmr.k.200114.079
34. Marinov Vranješ S., Varga M., Profiling the Use of Attitude Markers, Boosters and Hedges in Academic Written Production of International Student Mobility Participants, Journal of Language and Education, 11 (1) (2025) 116–130. DOI: 10.17323/jle.2025.22372
35. Batres-Prieto V., Abbas A., Self-mentions in design area disciplines: A corpus analysis, Heliyon, 11 (1) (2025) e41200. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41200
36. Mammadli N., Habibova K., The interplay between academic communication and speech manipulation: A psychometric analysis, TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psycho-logy, 32(S1) (2025) 29–37.
37. Hyland K., Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012. DOI: 10.1017/9781009406512
38. Swales J.M., Reflections on the concept of discourse community , ASp, 69 (2016) 7–19. DOI: 10.4000/asp.4774
39. Kulikova L.V., Language inclusion as a potential for interdisciplinary research and educational resource: multicultural experience, Terra Linguistica, 14 (2) (2023) 23–30. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.14203
40. Wharton S., Epistemological and interpersonal stance in a data description task: Findings from a discipline specific learner corpus, English Specific Purpose, 31 (4) (2012) 261–270.
41. Hyland K., Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing, Journal of Pragmatics, 34 (8) (2002) 1091–1112. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
42. Tang R., John S., The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun, English for Specific Purposes, 18 (1) (1999) 23–39. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5
43. Ivanič R., Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1998. DOI: 10.1075/swll.5
44. Beliaeva L.N., Kamshilova O.N., Malakhovskaya M.L., Corpus technologies in research and education: analysing english noun phrases in scientific texts, Society. Communication. Education, 12 (4) (2021) 46–59. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.12404
45. Abusalim N., Zidouni S., Alghazo S., Rababah G., Rayyan M., Textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in political discourse: a case study, Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9 (1) (2022). DOI: 10.1080/23311983.2022.2124683
46. Choemue S., Bram B., Discourse markers in academic and non-academic writings of Thai EFL learners, Studies in English Language and Education, 8 (3) (2021) 1209–1226. DOI: 10.24815/siele.v8i3.20122
47. Haninda M.H., Bram B., Academic Writing of EFL Students’ Undergraduate Theses: A Discourse Marker Analysis, ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5 (1) (2022) 109–114. DOI: 10.34050/elsjish.v5i1.19719
48. Huseynova R., Aliyeva N., Habibova K., Heydarov R., The evolution of the English language in the internet and social media era, Brazilian Journal of Education, Technology and Society (BRAJETS), 17 (SE4) (2024) 299–314. DOI: 10.14571/brajets.v17.nse4.299-314