Dynamics of English Borrowings in German Political Discourse: Functional and Semantic Aspect

Authors:
Abstract:

This paper examines the functioning of English borrowings in the individual discourse of leading German politicians representing different parties. Within the context of dominant transnational political ideas, English borrowings serve as a significant marker of political self-portrayal. The authors proceed from the premise that their use constitutes a deliberate strategy for stylizing professional communication and shaping the hybrid identity of a political actor. The empirical basis of the study is formed by the pre-election books written by Annalena Baerbock (Alliance 90/The Greens) and Sahra Wagenknecht (The Left Party), published during the campaign for the 20th Bundestag (2021). The research methodology integrates quantitative methods of corpus linguistics and qualitative discourse analysis, which allows for the explication of hidden ideological attitudes. The authors present an original classification of English borrowings, comprising five functional and semantic groups: terminologically motivated borrowings, conceptual borrowings, stylistic borrowings, pseudo-borrowings, and quotation borrowings. The study reveals a predominance of terminologically motivated borrowings (in terms of the units' number and their usage frequency) in the discourse of both politicians, and a minimal proportion of pseudo-borrowings and quotation borrowings (no more than 1,5%). The frequency of conceptual borrowings is consistent across both politicians' discourse (19%). However, their lexical diversity differs: they account for 27% of the unique borrowings used by A. Baerbock, compared to 16% for S. Wagenknecht. Stylistic borrowings are far more prevalent in A. Baerbock’s discourse (23%) as opposed to S. Wagenknecht’s, where they constitute only 8%. The results demonstrate that, despite differing party affiliations and ideological orientations, both politicians actively employ English-language borrowings to fill terminological gaps. At the same time, individual experience exerts a determining influence on the frequency and functional load of the borrowings. The analysis confirm that English borrowings serve as a tool for self-presentation, acting as indicators of commitment to progressive values or allegiance to specific ideological movements. In conclusion, the paper outlines prospects for further research by incorporating a larger texts' volume from representatives of various political spectra in Germany.

  • References

    1. Proshina Z.G., Conceptions of the English language globalization, Human Being: Image and Essence. Humanitarian Aspects, 1–2 (32–33) (2018) 12–30.

    2. Doinikova M.I., Anglo-Americanisms as a Source for Replenishing the Modern German Language, Philology. Theory & Practice, 12 (6) (2019) 135–138. DOI: 10.30853/filnauki.2019.6.27

    3. Badaeva N.V., Omelchenko M.S., Morphological assimilation of english borrowings in modern German (based on economic discourse in 2020−2023), Terra Linguistica, 16 (1) (2025) 7–18. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.16101.

    4. Kovács É., Anglizismen im Deutschen: Eine Gefahr oder eine natürliche Erscheinung?, Germanistische Studien, 7 (2009) 181–190.

    5. Pfalzgraf F., 12. ‚Anglisierung‘ und ‚Globalisierung‘: Aktuelle Diskurse zu Entlehnungen und moderner Sprachpurismus, ed. by G. Antos, T. Niehr, J. Spitzmüller, Handbuch Sprache im Urteil der Öffentlichkeit, De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2019, pp. 291–308. DOI: 10.1515/9783110296150-013.

    6. Burmasova S., Empirische Untersuchung der Anglizismen im Deutschen am Material der Zeitung Die WELT (Jahrgänge 1994 und 2004), University of Bamberg Press, Bamberg, 2010. DOI: 10.26530/OAPEN_368157

    7. Radtke M., Anglizismen im österreichischen Deutsch am Beispiel von ausgewählten Onlinezeitungen, Studia Germanica Gedanensia, 47 (2022) 103–109. DOI: 10.26881/sgg.2022.47.07.

    8. Borsch R., Politiker und ihr Umgang mit Anglizismen. Eine Untersuchung englischen Sprache-influsses auf Bundestagsdebatten, Verlag Dr. Kovac, Hamburg, 2008.

    9. Yuqian Zh., The word-formation potential of anglicisms in political vocabulary, Neophilology, 8 (2) (2022) 254–260. DOI: 10.20310/2587-6953-2022-8-2-254-260.

    10. Kameneva V.A., Rabkina N.V., English Borrowings in Russian Political Discourse: A Linguistic Personology Approach, Political Linguistics, 1(85) (2021) 33–40. DOI: 10.26170/1999-2629_2021_01_03

    11. Rycheva E.A., English Borrowings in Political Discourse in Russia and Czech Republic: Pragmatic Aspect, Povolzhskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik [Volga Region Pedagogical Bulletin], 9 (4 (33)) (2021) 197–202.

    12. Ruchkina E.M., Belova E. E., Karpenko A.A., Dinamics of Changes in Function of English Vocabulary in Russian Political Discourse, The Humanities and social sciences, 102 (1) (2024) 99–104. DOI: 10.18522/2070-1403-2024-102-1-99-104.

    13. Pogoretskaya O.A., English-Language Interference in Italian Political Discourse: A Functional Approach, Political Linguistics, 2 (104) (2024) 117–126.

    14. Vinnik R.A., The ideological function of Anglicisms in the political discourse of Russia and Germany, Philology. Theory & Practice, 18 (9) (2025) 3927–3935. DOI: 10.30853/phil20250538.

    15. Espagne M., Werner M., Deutsch-Französischer Kulturtransfer im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert. Zu einem neuen interdisziplinären Forschungsprogramm des C.N.R.S., Francia, 13 (1985) 502–510. DOI: 10.11588/fr.1985.0.52120

    16. Schmale W., Erkenntnisinteressen der Kulturtransferforschung, Campus, Frankfurt am Main, 2006.

    17. Nefedov S.T., Chernyavskaya V.E., Context in Linguistics: Pragmatic and Discourse Analytical Dimensions, Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 63 (2020) 83–97. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/63/5

    18. Littger P., Hello in the round. Der Trouble mit unserem Englisch und wie man ihn shootet, Verlag C.H. Beck, München, 2022.

    19. Fingerhuth M., Boas H.C., Anglizismen zwischen Linguistik und Laien-Linguistik: Zum Fremdwortpurismus des Vereins Deutsche Sprache im Anglizismen-Index. Eine frame-semantische Analyse seiner Metatexte, Sprach- und Textkulturen – interkulturelle und vergleichende Konzepte, ed by Cs. Földes, Narr Francke Attempto, Tübingen, 2018, pp. 19–41.

    20. Chigasheva M.A., Semantic Aspect of English Borrowings in German Political Media Discourse, Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 3 (819) (2019) 151–159.

    21. Belinsky A.V., Sahra Wagenknecht. Realist. Populist. Madonna of the Left, Current problems of Europe, 3 (127) (2025) 176–189. DOI: 10.31249/ape/2025.03.10

    22. Chernyavskaya V.E., Social meaning in the mirror of political correctness, Vestnik of Saint Pe-tersburg University. Language and Literature, 18 (2) (2021) 383–399. DOI: 10.21638/spbu09.2021.208

    23. Kostomarov V.G., Yazykovoy vkus epokhi: iz nablyudeniy nad rechevoy praktikoy massmedia [The Linguistic Taste of the Era: From Observations of the Speech Practices of the Mass Media], Zlatoust, St. Petersburg, 1999.

    24. Zharkynbekova S.K., Chernyavskaya V.E., Kazakh-Russian Bilingual Practice: Code-Mixing as a Resource in Communicative Interaction, RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Se-mantics, 13 (2) (2022) 468–482. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-2-468-482

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article