Naming Patterns in Turkish and Russian Financial Discourse Through a Distant Reading Approach: A Case of Central Bank Governors' Speeches

Authors:
Abstract:

This study explores naming patterns in Turkish and Russian financial discourse through a distant reading approach, using the speeches of the Central Bank Governors of Türkiye and Russia as representative material. Conducted within the framework of digital humanities, the research demonstrates the potential of the distant reading approach for contrastive linguistic analysis. At the first stage, a small, representative corpus was compiled in Turkish and Russian using BootCat tools. At the second stage, the corpora were analyzed with Voyant Tools, which enabled the visualization of the most frequent lexical units used to name financial phenomena in both languages and the relations among these units. At the third stage, Igor Mel'čuk's Meaning-Text Theory was applied to interpret the lexical relations between the visualized units. The focus was placed on two naming patterns: PhenomenonAttribute and PhenomenonAction/State, examined comparatively in Turkish and Russian. The results indicate that Turkish financial discourse often employs borrowings and calques, whereas Russian discourse favors lexicalized forms and secondary naming patterns for financial and economic phenomena. Although these observations are limited to the selected material, the findings highlight the pedagogical and methodological value of data-driven analysis. The study underscores the potential of digital visualization tools for linguistic inquiry and advocates for the development of applied resources, such as annotated corpora, for the Turkish-Russian language pair.

  • References

    1. Moretti F., Conjectures on World Literature, New Left Review. Available at: https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii1/articles/franco-moretti-conjectures-on-world-literature (accessed: 10.10.2025).

    2. Moretti F., Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History, Verso, London, 2005.

    3. Moretti F., Distant Reading, Verso, London, 2013.

    4. Kozan O., Close and distant reading in translation studies (a case of poetry), Istanbul University Journal of Translation Studies, 22 (2025) 127–147. DOI: 10.26650/iujts.2025.1555242

    5. Gaballo V., The language of business, economics and finance: A corpus-driven, analytical discourse approach, EUM, Macerata, 2012.

    6. Martínez Egido J.J., Creation of a corpus on the economic-financial discourse in Spanish: Preambles for the study of lexis modalization, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95 (2013) 276–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.648

    7. Priola M.P., Molino A., Tizzanini G., Zicchino L., The informative value of central banks talks: A topic model application to sentiment analysis, Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2 (3) (2022) 181–204. DOI: 10.3934/dsfe.2022009

    8. Alonso-Robisco A., Carbó J.M., Central bank digital currencies in discourse: Sentiment analysis with large language models, Economía y Sociedad Digital, 5 (1) (2023) 45–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104643

    9. Vaca C., Astorgano M., López-Rivero A.J., Tejerina F., Sahelices B., Interpretability of deep learning models in analysis of Spanish financial text, Neural Computing and Applications, 36 (10) (2024) 7509–7527. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-024-09474-8

    10. Hu K., Li Q., Xie J., Pu Y., Guo Y., Using pre-trained models and graph convolution networks to find the causal relations among events in the Chinese financial text data, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83 (7) (2024) 18699–18720. DOI: 10.1007/s11042-023-15496-6

    11. Vazirani K., Evaluating the economic disparities in the world: Sentiment analysis on central bank speeches from third world and first world countries, International Journal of Information Technology, 16 (1) (2024) 69–76. DOI: 10.1007/s41870-023-01627-7

    12. Loukas L., Fergadiotis M., Androutsopoulos I., Malakasiotis P., EDGAR-CORPUS: Billions of tokens make the world go round, Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Economics and Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, Punta Cana, 2021. pp. 13–18. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.econlp-1.2

    13. Soares da Silva A., From economic crisis to austerity policies through conceptual metaphor: A corpus-based comparison of metaphors of crisis and austerity in the Portuguese press, The Language of Crisis Metaphors, frames and discourses, ed. by M. Huang, L.-L. Holmgreen, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 2020. pp. 51–86. DOI: 10.1075/dapsac.87.02soa

    14. Cheng W., Ho J., A Corpus Study of Bank Financial Analyst Reports: Semantic Fields and Metaphors, International Journal of Business Communication, 54 (3) (2015) 258–282. DOI: 10.1177/2329488415572790

    15. García A.C., Translation in financial Spanish: A corpus-based study on the use of metaphor, Current Trends in Translation Teaching and Learning E, 6 (2019) 331–356.

    16. Apresyan K.G., Metaforizatsiya v sovremennom finansovom diskurse (na materiale angloyazychnoy, russkoyazychnoy pressy [Metaphorization in contemporary financial discourse (based on English- and Russian-language press)], Lingvisticheskoye naslediye L.V. Shcherby v svete sovremennoy nauki o yazyke: sbornik nauchnykh trudov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii v ramkakh V Mezhdunarodnogo festivalya nauki [The linguistic heritage of L.V. Shcherba in the light of modern language science: a collection of scientific papers of the International Scientific and Practical Conference within the framework of the 5th International Science Festival], IIU MGOU, Moscow, 2020. pp. 5–11.

    17. Telegin V.V., Monetarnyy diskurs: Kommunikativnaya sfera tsentralnogo banka Rossii [Monetary discourse: The communicative sphere of the Central Bank of Russia], Finansovyy diskurs: Aktualnyye aspekty issledovaniya [Financial Discourse: Current Aspects of Research], FLINTA, Moscow, 2022, pp. 74–92.

    18. Boyacıoğlu E.Z., Adıgüzel T., Taş H., Türksever E., An emotional explanation of the interest decision: Twitter analysis in Türkiye, Ekonomi Maliye İşletme Dergisi, 6 (2) (2023) 82–99. DOI: 10.46737/emid.1311081

    19. Derbisheva Z.K., Sravnitelnaya grammatika russkogo i turetskogo yazykov [Comparative Grammar of the Russian and Turkish Languages], FLINTA, Moscow, 2015.

    20. Yazykovaya nominatsiya (Obshchiye voprosy) [Linguistic Naming (General Issues)], ed. by B.A. Serebrennikov, A.A. Ufimtseva, Nauka, Moscow, 1977.

    21. Kozan O., Dil Dizgesinde Eşdizimlilik: Öğretim Odaklı Dilbilimsel Betimleme Örneği [Collocations in the Language System: A Linguistic Description for Pedagogical Purposes], Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5 (2) (2019) 251–266. DOI: 10.31464/jlere.570068

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article