<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
  <titleid>80301</titleid>
  <issn>2782-5450</issn>
  <journalInfo lang="ENG">
    <title>Terra Linguistica</title>
  </journalInfo>
  <issue>
    <volume>10</volume>
    <number>4</number>
    <altNumber> </altNumber>
    <dateUni>2019</dateUni>
    <pages>1-140</pages>
    <articles>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>7-16</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Pushkin Leningrad State University</orgName>
              <surname>Shaidurov</surname>
              <initials>Vladimir </initials>
              <email>s-w-n@mail.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Altai State University</orgName>
              <surname>Goncharov</surname>
              <initials>Yurii</initials>
              <email>yuriig@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>Barnaul, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">History of German colonization in Russia during the second half of the 18th century presented in domestic publications (1860 – 1917)</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Numerous German colonies appeared in the Volga region in the mid-1760s, and in Novorossiya in the 1780s in the course of implementation of colonization policy and economic development of the suburbs and recently incorporated territories. The process of migration to Russia took place in different historical conditions, which resulted in formation of special legal norms for various groups of German population. Further, it had a significant impact on the economic development of the Volga and the Black Sea Germans. By the end of the 19th century the high standard of living of the German colonists in different regions of the Russian Empire gave rise to the notorious “German issue”, and its solution was associated with implementation of prohibitive legislation and elimination of German land ownership. All of that induced a dynamic discussion in Russia and forced addressing the history of emergence of the German colonies. The paper considers the historiographical analysis of publications of the Russian authors, resorting in the 1860s – 1917 to studying of the German colonization history in the Russian Empire of the second half of the 18th century. Academic interest in this problem arose as a response to the publicistic papers of anti-Kraut focus. For convincing argumentation of their own positions, the authors of the research started to address not only the regulatory acts of the times of Catherine the Great and Paul I, but also the current records remained in the archives, as well as statistical materials and memories of the first settlers. They have contributed heavily to reconstruction of the initial period of the Russian Germans and had a beneficial effect on reduction of anti-Knaut sentiments.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.10401 </doi>
          <udk>930.2 07.00.09</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>Russian Empire</keyword>
            <keyword>colonization</keyword>
            <keyword>Russian Germans</keyword>
            <keyword>historiography</keyword>
            <keyword>German issue</keyword>
            <keyword>foreign colonies</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2019.38.1/</furl>
          <file>7-16.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>17-25</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Тomsk State University</orgName>
              <surname>Anikin</surname>
              <initials>Daniil</initials>
              <email>dandee@list.ru</email>
              <address>Tomsk, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Historical responsibility as a subject of social and philosophical reflection</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The purpose of the article is to analyze philosophical approaches to the concept of “historical responsibility”, designed to formulate the social and philosophical content of this category and to make possible a comparative analysis of the forms of actualization of historical responsibility in the modern social space. The author identifies curative, religious and critical approaches to historical responsibility, identifies their essential characteristics and analyzes shortcomings in terms of use in the analysis of social and political reality. The methodology of the study is a synthesis of praxiological and network approaches. The praxiological approach makes it possible to move from treating an act as an act of establishing responsibility to examining sociocultural contexts that influence the formation of practices of responsibility. The network approach refers to the interdependence of historical responsibility practices and mechanisms for their formation in a pluralistic social order. For social and philosophical understanding of historical responsibility, it is necessary to make a transition from the principles of individualism and substance to the principles of collectivism and constructivism. Such a transition makes it possible to present historical responsibility not as a rational establishment of a particular politician or an ontological basis of human behavior, but as a social phenomenon. On the one hand, it is the result of established social practices in the community, and on the other - itself acquires forms of practice, setting a new format of symbolic actions and their discursive justification. The author 's contribution is the conceptualization of methodological synthesis of praxiological and network approaches, allowing to consider historical responsibility not in ethical or anthropological, but in social context. Historical responsibility, with this approach, acts as a mechanism for communities to compete for the redistribution of symbolic capital.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.10402</doi>
          <udk>172.4</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>historical responsibility</keyword>
            <keyword>ethics</keyword>
            <keyword>space</keyword>
            <keyword>social practices</keyword>
            <keyword>symbolic capital</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2019.38.2/</furl>
          <file>17-25.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>26-38</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Murmansk Arctic State University</orgName>
              <surname>Shachin </surname>
              <initials>Sviatoslav </initials>
              <email>s_shachin@mail.ru</email>
              <address>Murmansk, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">On the subject of social philosophy: the experience of synthesis of phenomenological and system theories of society on the basis of the communicative theory of mind by J. Habermas</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The article deals with the problem of the emergence of new meanings in mankind in the conditions of the global crisis. This refers to the aggravation of problems in the development of society asa whole due to the destructive influence on the life world of the social system, leading to the subordination of public life to the one-sided logic of economic efficiency. To solve this problem, the methodology of synthesis of phenomenological and system theory of society is developed. Society is understood as intersubjectivity, which has reached the self-awareness. Society is able to realize itself just through the search for collective meanings of social life. These meanings then become guidelines for collective activity on material and symbolic reproduction of society. Therefore, society is the unity of the system and the world of life, in which the system provides material reproduction of society, and the world of life – a symbolic reproduction. New meanings of social development are considered from the pointof view of the system theory (as guidelines of collective activity) and from the position of the phenomenological theory. Within the framework of the system theory, new guidelines for collective activity are necessary to overcome the crises of system integration, and within the framework of the phenomenological theory, new meanings allow to fill the fundamental value of freedom for modernity with concrete content. It follows that the phenomenological and systemic theory of society itself is not sufficient to define these new meanings, they can be developed only on the basis of the synthesis of these theories based on the consideration of social evolution on a global scale as the interaction of the system and the life world.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.10403</doi>
          <udk>17</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>intersubjectivity</keyword>
            <keyword>social meanings of being</keyword>
            <keyword>the phenomenological theory of society</keyword>
            <keyword>life-world</keyword>
            <keyword>system theory of society</keyword>
            <keyword>anthropological and social genesis</keyword>
            <keyword>communicative mind</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2019.38.3/</furl>
          <file>26-38.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>39-46</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Perm National Research Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Kushnina </surname>
              <initials>Liudmila </initials>
              <email>lkushnina@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>Perm, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Cognitive-semiotic translation space</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The contribution explores the cognitive-semiotic translation space as a meaningful semantic continuum. The translator’s focus on and research of this continuum results in generating harmonious translation. Methodologically the research resides on the author’s concept of translation space treating translation as a synergetic system of transposing multiple heterogeneous meanings from source into target culture. Having studied the semiotic translation space, the contribution concludes that translation space is a part of semiosphere through its extensive derivative of meanings of anthropocentric (author’s, translator’s and recipient’s fields) and textual (content, energetic and phatic fields) origins. Results also indicate that translator’s linguistic consciousness is based on inner speech mechanisms, his internal speak-through, internal translation, external speak-through, external translation and mechanism switching. The integrated research of cognitive and semiotic aspects of translation makes it possible to provide the underlying theory of generative translation.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.10404</doi>
          <udk>1: 165; 1:167; 30: 303.01</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>semiotic space</keyword>
            <keyword>cognitive space</keyword>
            <keyword>translation space</keyword>
            <keyword>meaning</keyword>
            <keyword>synergy</keyword>
            <keyword>harmonious translation</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2019.38.4/</furl>
          <file>39-46.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>REV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>47-55</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <scopusid>56501751300</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0002-6967-2660</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO)</orgName>
              <surname>Yakovleva</surname>
              <initials>Aleksandra</initials>
              <address>Moscow, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <authorCodes>
              <researcherid>AAF-1855-2019</researcherid>
              <scopusid>57203537524</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0001-9585-9472</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the RAS</orgName>
              <surname>Shestakova</surname>
              <initials>Larisa</initials>
              <email>lara.shestakova@mail.ru</email>
              <address>Moscow, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Stratification of the lexicon of the modern Russian language and its reflection in the explanatory dictionary: ways of the discussion (round table review)</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The article is a review of the problem-methodical round table devoted to the stratification of the vocabulary of the modern Russian language and its reflection in the explanatory dictionary. The purpose of the round table is correlated with the objectives of a research project aimed to identify features of the stylistic stratification of the Russian literary language of the early twenty-first century and the production, on an interdisciplinary basis, of adequate ways of its reflection in the dictionary of a normative type (in this case, “Academic Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Language”). Russian lexicon stylistic stratification, its representation in the explanatory dictionary as the most important public source of knowledge about the language, the description in such a dictionary of units of lexical groups reflecting the active processes in the spoken and book-written varieties of the literary language, the use in this work of the resources of the Russian National Corpus (RNC) were discussed. On the example of the analysis of units of different lexical groups and subject areas (“Colloquial vocabulary of vernacular origin”; “Informatics”, “Political Science”, “Religion and Church”) it is shown that the introduction of such vocabulary in dictionaries requires mandatory involvement of specialists in each subject area, as well as the development of a special approach to the selection of words (to the compilation of the dictionary), and the principles of compiling dictionary entries. The article contains scientific and methodological recommendations on improving the ways of presenting stylistic categories of vocabulary in the explanatory dictionaries of the Russian language. It is concluded that it is necessary to develop a stylistic classification of the vocabulary of the selected groups, which would, firstly, be confirmed by modern language material, and secondly, would be practically applicable in the compilation of General explanatory dictionaries.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.10405</doi>
          <udk>81</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>national language</keyword>
            <keyword>stylistic stratification of the lexicon</keyword>
            <keyword>lexicography</keyword>
            <keyword>explanatory dictionary</keyword>
            <keyword>Russian National Corpus</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2019.38.5/</furl>
          <file>47-55.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>56-68</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Mezentseva </surname>
              <initials>Maria </initials>
              <email>mezentseva1992@mail.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <authorCodes>
              <scopusid>56542653500</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0003-3058-7386</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Nina V. Popova</surname>
              <email>ninavaspo@mail.ru</email>
              <address>Polytechnicheskaya, 29, St.Petersburg, 195251, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Modern tendencies of project method technologies development in school and university education</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The methodology of the project method of teaching a foreign language is examined from the point of view of the classification of projects, their goals, principles, objectives and stages. The critical literature of the last decade for determining the typology of projects is analyzed, and on this basis a universal typological table is developed. 25 educational projects used by teachers in the framework of school and university education are analyzed. The trends of thematic variation of the project formats and the insufficient use of currently relevant information technologies have been identified. The main advantages and disadvantages present in most of the analyzed projects are identified. Information is presented on the most representative projects, where they are examined from the point of view of typology and the most relevant features, such as the method of evaluating project participants, the form of monitoring, the inclusion of project activities in modern teaching and methodological complexes, etc. An innovative model of an interdisciplinary university project for undergraduates in technical areas is proposed, which is implemented in the author’s textbook. It is proposed to use a wide range of information and communication technologies (ICT): from traditional and local (Microsoft Office, MOODLE) to the most advanced (social networks, such as Instagram, professional programs, such as AutoCAD). An interactive project with periodic reporting is proposed, at the end of which project teams create a physical product that is potentially applicable in their professional field, with subsequent defense of the project at the end of the semester. The relevance of this model is proved on the basis of the analysis of all the advantages and disadvantages of the projects under consideration. The innovativeness of the project helps to enhance the internal motivation of students and its effectiveness in teaching a foreign language.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.10406</doi>
          <udk>378</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>project method</keyword>
            <keyword>project technology</keyword>
            <keyword>ICT</keyword>
            <keyword>project typology</keyword>
            <keyword>teaching a foreign language</keyword>
            <keyword>educational project</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2019.38.6/</furl>
          <file>56-68.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>69-85</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Dmitrijev </surname>
              <initials>Alexander </initials>
              <email>avd84@list.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0002-7519-2161</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Kogan</surname>
              <initials>Marina</initials>
              <email>m_kogan@inbox.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">The Potential of Corpus Linguistics in Training Foreign Language Teachers Majoring in Computer Assisted Language Teaching</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">In modern world practice, Corpus Linguistics (CL) is gaining serious positions. The number of available corpora accounts several thousands which allows conducting various research in linguistics, cultural studies, sociology, history, cognitive linguistics and other humanities. The paper reviews some of the most substantial ones. Although CL has a remarkable impact on language teaching the literature overview shows that its potential is only modestly used in curricula of future language teachers and translators. The paper analyzes the role and place of CL in the curriculum of the Computer Assisted Language Teaching (CALT) Master program launched at SPbPU in 2016. The analysis of working programs of disciplines included into the CALT Master Program has revealed that most of them either contain special modules aiming at acquisition of and applying CL methods in research and teaching or allow integrating CL approaches in studying certain topics. The paper states that students have to acquire corpus literacy which means solving corpus search and research tasks of different complexity ranging from getting familiar with the corpus structure to compiling own subcorpora and dealing with heuristic type tasks. Three stages of students’ familiarization with big corpora are distinguished. The recommended tasks for each stage for the Russian National corpus developed by authors are provided. Further research is discussed.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.10407</doi>
          <udk>378.02:37.016</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>Corpus Linguistics</keyword>
            <keyword>linguistic corpora</keyword>
            <keyword>DDL approach</keyword>
            <keyword>working syllabuses</keyword>
            <keyword>the Russian National Corpus</keyword>
            <keyword>search tasks for the RNC</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2019.38.7/</furl>
          <file>69-85.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>86-93</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Arkannikova </surname>
              <initials>Marina </initials>
              <email>marinesku.spb@mail.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Strategic communication in the context of “University 4.0” social innovation culture</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The paper is devoted to studying the formation of modern communication technologies in the conditions of the global digital transformation. The methodological principle of work was a sociological analysis. The paper describes the model of the university’s new role, cultural code of social innovations for new-type universities within the knowledge economy. The study considers communication strategies in terms of shifting from “University 1.0” to “University 4.0”. The results of the study show that in the context of the new knowledge economy and the new social order (in the sociological aspect of institutional, systemic and cross-cultural approaches) of all interested actors: industry – education – science – state – society (which corresponds to the University 4.0 model), the university not only generates modern knowledge, but also provides their transfer to the national system of social development, forms a special social, cultural and intellectual environment. This work is an attempt to initiate a closer examination of the mechanisms of innovative processes in the university environment in terms of generating socio-cultural startups, technological and institutional priorities, problems of the regional imbalance of the educational space and forecasting the socio-economic situation in Russia in the context of its competitiveness and prospects for creating infrastructure, points knowledge economy growth.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.10408</doi>
          <udk>316</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>strategic communications</keyword>
            <keyword>corporate communications</keyword>
            <keyword>innovations</keyword>
            <keyword>social order in education</keyword>
            <keyword>University 4.0</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2019.38.8/</furl>
          <file>86-93.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>94-102</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Lomonosov Moscow State University</orgName>
              <surname>Bronnikov </surname>
              <initials>Ivan </initials>
              <email> ivbronn@gmail.com</email>
              <address>Moscow, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Network civil initiatives as a factor of public value transformation</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The article shows that the network organization of actors greatly increases the chances of conveying a consolidated position to people who make political decisions and collectively influence the authorities. The institutionalization of network activism that has taken place in recent years has made it possible to implement the network of civic practices into the political process, moving them to a new level of influence, thanks to building numerous inclusive horizontal connections. However, such practices are often unsystematic and episodic, preventing the increase of the general civic participation of citizens. It is proved that the tendency of formation of social significance of political decisions made contributed to the introduction of network civic initiatives in the value field of politics. It is concluded that network civic initiatives are an activating factor in the population, gain public value and quickly move into the political category. Network civic initiatives form important vectors of development of civil society in Russia, which transform complex forms of social development through the inclusion of post-material public values.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.10409</doi>
          <udk>323.2</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>civil activism</keyword>
            <keyword>civil participation</keyword>
            <keyword>public values</keyword>
            <keyword>global public goods</keyword>
            <keyword>social media</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2019.38.9/</furl>
          <file>94-102.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>BRV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>103-110</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <researcherid>N-8979-2015</researcherid>
              <scopusid>6603404917</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0002-0095-8986</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Sergey N. Pogodin</surname>
              <email>pogodin56@mail.ru</email>
              <address>Polytechnicheskaya, 29, St.Petersburg, 195251, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Li</surname>
              <initials>Jingcheng</initials>
              <email>lijc@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>Polytechnicheskaya, 29, St.Petersburg, 195251, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Chinese-Russian cultural relations: traditions of the academic dialogue. Review on the collective monograph “A history of the cultural exchanges between China and Russia”</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The article explores the philosophy of Chinese-Russian cultural relations in the Chinese monograph “A history of the cultural exchanges between China and Russia” in 2018, ISBN 978-7-201-11214-5. The monograph consists of two volumes, edited by Professor Xiao Yuqiu. The work was written with the assistance of a large archival material located in the central and provincial archives of China and Russia. The scientific novelty of the work is a systematic presentation of the history of cultural relations between China and Russia, starting from the ancient period to the present day. The authors investigated the entire process of the formation of Chinese-Russian cultural exchange, studied the main directions and stages of its development.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.10410</doi>
          <udk>130.2</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>China</keyword>
            <keyword>Russia</keyword>
            <keyword>Chinese-Russian cultural relations</keyword>
            <keyword>cultural exchange</keyword>
            <keyword>Qing Empire</keyword>
            <keyword>Russian Empire</keyword>
            <keyword>People's Republic of China</keyword>
            <keyword>USSR</keyword>
            <keyword>Russian Federation</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2019.38.10/</furl>
          <file>103-110.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>111-138</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>University of Potsdam</orgName>
              <surname>Kosta</surname>
              <initials>Peter</initials>
              <email>gavanna2002@mail.ru</email>
              <address>Potsdam, Germany</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Grammatical and prosodic means of human- and animal-oriented (pre-) directives of talk-in-interaction</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">This paper discusses closings considered as the most sensible parts of conversation. Closings must satisfy their major goal, namely to end up conversation, but at the same time, they should not violate any of the conversation maxims and should not cause social conflicts between the interlocutors. Closings are considered in a way ‘signals of face-saving strategies’. This paper provides evidence that institutional conversations differ from natural conversations, especially with regard to their closings, an aspect of structural property, which they may share with other structural properties of openings, but in a very special form and way - ending up conversation being their crucial and major invariant. The author claims that prosody does not only play a crucial role in order to mark cognitive semantic information (topic-focus articulation) but also to mark expressivity and politeness and to switch grammatical meanings of turning them to meanings of communicative senses. In addition to the communication between humans and humans, a special case is examined.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.10411</doi>
          <udk>81`33</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>Conversational Analysis</keyword>
            <keyword>Grammar</keyword>
            <keyword>Syntax-Prosody-Interface</keyword>
            <keyword>Colloquial Russian</keyword>
            <keyword>Speech Act Theory</keyword>
            <keyword>Sociolinguistics</keyword>
            <keyword>Directives</keyword>
            <keyword>Praat-Spectograms</keyword>
            <keyword>Mean Formants</keyword>
            <keyword>Pitch Accent</keyword>
            <keyword>Mimicry</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2019.38.11/</furl>
          <file/>
        </files>
      </article>
    </articles>
  </issue>
</journal>
