<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
  <titleid>80301</titleid>
  <issn>2782-5450</issn>
  <journalInfo lang="ENG">
    <title>Terra Linguistica</title>
  </journalInfo>
  <issue>
    <volume>13</volume>
    <number>1</number>
    <altNumber> </altNumber>
    <dateUni>2022</dateUni>
    <pages>1-84</pages>
    <articles>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>7-17</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <scopusid>55446258300</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0002-4160-6215</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>L.N.Gumilyov Eurasian National University</orgName>
              <surname>Zharkynbekova</surname>
              <initials>Sholpan</initials>
              <email>zharkynbekova_shk@enu.kz</email>
              <address>Astana, Kazakhstan</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Nazarbayev University</orgName>
              <surname>Guven</surname>
              <initials>Funda</initials>
              <email>funda.guven@nu.edu.kz</email>
              <address>Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Formation of Linguist professional identity in the digital educational environment in Kazakhstan</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The digital transformation underway today undoubtedly leads to certain changes in the structure of the educational process, its organizational formats and applied pedagogical technologies. The intensive spread of digital technologies and the possibility of rapid transfer of information to any part of the world via the Internet require a serious approach to the development of qualifications and competences requirements for students. This problem is of particular relevance for the student community, as their period of identity formation (professional, social) coincides with the intensification of the digital environment. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of digitalization of learning on the formation of professional identity of a future specialist (in this case, a philologist). The results of the survey of students of one of Kazakhstan’s leading universities, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, made it possible to identify students’ attitudes to the transition to online learning, determine how the nature of their social interactions has changed, find out their preferences in the format of education, thereby determine how the digital environment affects their professional formation as future philologists.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.13101</doi>
          <udk>81</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>digital learning environment</keyword>
            <keyword>online learning</keyword>
            <keyword>professional identity</keyword>
            <keyword>student satisfaction</keyword>
            <keyword>assessment of learning effectiveness</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2022.47.1/</furl>
          <file>7%E2%80%9317.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>18-27</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Moscow State Linguistic University</orgName>
              <surname>Imber</surname>
              <initials>Slaviana</initials>
              <email>yanaimber@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>Moscow, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">The role of SPIEGEL readers’ comments in shaping the reputation of news media</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The article analyzes the news post readers’ comments on the social networking sites. The author admits that the users’ comments have a significant role in establishing a good or bad digital reputation for online mass-media. The readers’ comments are considered as “evaluative statements” with all their essential elements (subject, object, basis of evaluation), whose structure and semantics are being analyzed in this article. The author dwells on the media of general evaluation (good – bad) in in readers’ comments. Moreover, the author investigates the partial evaluation in readers’ statements. Besides, the author emphasizes some difficulties, which are connected with the extraction of the basis of evaluation. The author points out the news’ topics, which caused positive (e.g. the news about someone’s tragedy/problems or posts about peace, unity or love) or negative (e.g. coronavirus’ statistics) readers’ reaction.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.13102</doi>
          <udk>81</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>social networking sites</keyword>
            <keyword>comments</keyword>
            <keyword>news posts</keyword>
            <keyword>digital reputation</keyword>
            <keyword>general evaluation</keyword>
            <keyword>partial evaluation</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2022.47.2/</furl>
          <file>18-27.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>28-35</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Moscow City University</orgName>
              <surname>Glotova </surname>
              <initials>Yana </initials>
              <email>yanaglotova13@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>Moscow, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Idiosyncratic way of antonymic Russian-English translation in the sphere of adjectives (case study of „The Lady with the Dog” by Anton P. Chekhov)</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The paper studies the strategy of antonymic translation in the sphere of the adjective as the main translation transformation and the ways of its linguistic implementation within the framework of artistic discourse. The purpose of the study is to systematize the models of antonymic translation in the field of the adjective in the Russian and English languages based on the metonymic principle. The empirical base of the research includes examples of negation obtained by the method of continuous sampling from the work of Anton P. Chekhov “The Lady with the Dog” and its English translations. Theoretical provisions related to the description of the semantic category of antonymy in Russian and English, as well as various interpretations of the concept of antonymic translation were analyzed. The paper revealed the features of antonymic translation as a special translation technique and indicated three main strategies of antonymic translation, such as the negativity strategy, the positivity strategy and the cancellation strategy. The findings of the study identified antonymic translation strategies in the sphere of the adjective, which are widely employed in modern translation practice.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.13103</doi>
          <udk>347.78.034</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>antonymy</keyword>
            <keyword>translation transformations</keyword>
            <keyword>antonymic translation</keyword>
            <keyword>negation</keyword>
            <keyword>double negation</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2022.47.3/</furl>
          <file>28-35.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>36-47</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Novosibirsk State Technical University</orgName>
              <surname>Kolesnikova </surname>
              <initials>Nataliya</initials>
              <email>n.kolesnikova@corp.nstu.ru</email>
              <address>Novosibirsk, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Russian scientific style vs academic writing</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The presented article is a discussion about the problems and prospects of teaching academic writing in Russian at the universities of the Russian Federation. The aim of the article is to identify, based on the analysis of linguistic and methodological literature, what is new for Russian scientific writing, what will enrich its theory and practice and what is acceptable to Russian culture. The literature review shows that “academic writing” as a writing technique now trending in Russia is in demand and use only for teachers of English. The Russian language in this case has to take an auxiliary and secondary role, a temporary “crutch” employed to teach researchers how to write English scientific texts. The author believes that the concept of “academic writing” is just a technology for teaching the culture of written scientific communication in English, and a number of innovations and assertions postulated by academic writing are either debatable or unacceptable, and even destructive to Russian scientific style and Russian science. This is especially true for social sciences, which have their own terminology that has been developed over the years and which solve regional problems. The author considers the Roundtable discussions organized by the Commission on development of higher education and science of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation and Pushkin State Russian Language Institute to be of great importance for preserving the Russian language for Russian science. The author concludes that theoretical and methodological fundamentals of academic writing are not clearly formulated or recorded in comparison with Russian scientific writing, and the appeals to their mastering are mostly declarative in nature. The author proposes to attribute the concept of “academic writing” to writing texts in English.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.13104</doi>
          <udk>81</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>academic writing</keyword>
            <keyword>culture of Russian scientific communication</keyword>
            <keyword>English language teaching technology</keyword>
            <keyword>theoretical and methodological fundamentals of Russian scientific style</keyword>
            <keyword>technology of academic writing</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2022.47.4/</furl>
          <file>36-47.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>48-56</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Moscow City University</orgName>
              <surname>Suleimanova </surname>
              <initials>Olga </initials>
              <email>olgasoul@rambler.ru</email>
              <address>Moscow, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Moscow City University</orgName>
              <surname>Vodyanitskaya </surname>
              <initials>Albina </initials>
              <email>avodyanickaya@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>Moscow, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Academic Recycling as a new reality: defining digital identity of a modern researcher</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Publications make an integral part of the research trajectory as they make the researchers and their findings visible in the global academic world; they construe, directly and indirectly, researchers’ digital identity. Academic recycling is an emerging tendency in the academic world that should be challenged. The paper focuses on the current academic practices and on how they affect the researchers’ digital identity formed by a variety of parameters as follows: generation of one’s academic profile, digital web engines search and research, and one’s publication practices. Living in the global information environment gave rise to the challenges related to defining the researchers’ status referring to those directly defining the authors’ identity: the so-called visibility, as well as some characteristics that indirectly define the identity though inference. The first cluster involves the authors’ profiles on publications, affiliation and other metadata. The second cluster covers the parameters that call for special attention, especially in the long-term perspective. The methods used to pursue the objectives involve analyzing the digital identity of a modern researcher: deduce the requirements the authors’ profile is to meet, his/her stance and reputation in the global academic environment. The ways to challenge such predator practices as recycling publishing, as well as their triggering factors are analyzed relying on the still underestimated antiplagiarism resource as an efficient filter. The research proposes a structure of a modern scientists’ digital profile as a combination of objective data and information related to academic ethical practice (plagiarism, different types of self-plagiarism, such as academic recycling, translation plagiarism). The conclusion is that the visibility requirements involve relying on objective criteria as well as on the ethical spectrum related to academic publications and academic recycling to the utmost degree.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.13105</doi>
          <udk>81'23</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>web identity</keyword>
            <keyword>author’s profile</keyword>
            <keyword>plagiarism</keyword>
            <keyword>academic recycling</keyword>
            <keyword>academic discourse</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2022.47.5/</furl>
          <file>48-56.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>57-69</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia</orgName>
              <surname>Kozhevnikova </surname>
              <initials>Margarita </initials>
              <email>mkozhevnikova1@gmail.com</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Reflection of the method: case study of a human education</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The article analyzes the method, understood by the author as a “phenomenological approach”, required for research, in particular, the philosophical and anthropological research of education. This is the problem of the research method in general, which has theoretical and also practical significance, to rethink the “known” (as in the case of education in the face of dehumanizing civilizational trends). The study is based on philosophical methodology, primarily phenomenological and dialectical approaches, and proceeds from the materials of the philosophical and anthropological research of education. The results presented are that the “phenomenological approach” is problematized and refined in accordance with the structure of the research process: this is a preliminary phase, proper phenomenological phase, and the post-phenomenological phase of the study. Within the framework of the first phase, the problem of reflection on the thematization of the phenomenon is singled out and, using the example of education, the philosophical and anthropological nature of the study is substantiated and such a phenomenon as “essential education” is thematized. Within the second phase, the concept of “natural phenomenology” is introduced and the essence of the “phenomenological approach” is clarified, which received its formulations from Hegel and Husserl. Using the example of philosophical and anthropological research, this phase demonstrates the discovery of layers of human experience, with their key phenomena (the primordial phenomenon of “order”, the basic phenomenon of “agency ”, etc.), which makes it possible to understand the phenomenon of education as the growth of agency. In the analysis of the post-phenomenological phase, the problem of the impossibility of phenomenological purism was raised, and therefore, as its solution, the use of scientific conceptuality as a modern system of interpretive relevancies for the formation of the required language and conceptual series was proposed.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.13106</doi>
          <udk>37.012.1; 37.035</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>method</keyword>
            <keyword>phenomenological approach</keyword>
            <keyword>philosophical anthropological research</keyword>
            <keyword>scientific concepts</keyword>
            <keyword>education</keyword>
            <keyword>essential erudition</keyword>
            <keyword>agency</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2022.47.6/</furl>
          <file>57-69.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>70-83</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Li</surname>
              <initials>Menglong</initials>
              <email>244591055@qq.com</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Jilin University</orgName>
              <surname>Bai </surname>
              <initials>Yajing</initials>
              <email>baiyajing@jlu.edu.cn</email>
              <address>Changchun, China</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="003">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Jilin University</orgName>
              <surname>Qin </surname>
              <initials>Benchuyue </initials>
              <email>qinbenchuyue@jlu.edu.cn</email>
              <address>Changchun, China</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Pros and Cons of University Merger and Development Strategies: A Case Study of Jilin University in China</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">In 1993, the CPC Central Committee and the State Council made a decision to gradually promote the reform of the higher education system, put forward the eight character policy slogan of “readjustment, restructuring, consolidation, and improvement”, and successively merged 637 colleges and universities into 70 multidisciplinary and comprehensive colleges and universities. Jilin University was formed on June 12, 2000 by the merger of the former Jilin University, Jilin University of Technology, Norman Bethune Medical University, Changchun University of Science and Technology and Changchun Institute of Posts and Telecommunications. On August 29, 2004, the former Quartermaster University of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army was transferred to Jilin University. Jilin University is a typical case of university merger. It has been more than 30 years since the “wave of university merger” in the 1990s. Timely summarizing the relevant experience and lessons is conducive to providing reference experience for university decision-making in the future. Firstly, this paper analyzes the reasons for the merger of colleges and universities, analyzes the necessity of the merger of colleges and universities from three aspects: the lack of educational resources, the discipline structure not meeting the requirements of the time, and the reform of government institutions. The authors take Jilin University as an example to summarize the benefits of the merger of colleges and universities from both theoretical and empirical aspects. As a mode of university development, merger also has its problems in the choice of merger policy and the process of merger. Finally, in view of these existing problems, this paper summarizes the relevant solutions of Jilin University, and puts forward supplementary measures from the perspective of the government, universities and teachers and students, hoping to provide experience for the practice of university merger.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JHSS.13107</doi>
          <udk>378</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>Colleges and universities</keyword>
            <keyword>Merger of colleges and universities</keyword>
            <keyword>Jilin University</keyword>
            <keyword>Cultural inheritance</keyword>
            <keyword>Reform in education</keyword>
            <keyword>Higher education in China</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://human.spbstu.ru/article/2022.47.7/</furl>
          <file/>
        </files>
      </article>
    </articles>
  </issue>
</journal>
