Linguistic Resemantization of the Petersburg Text: Mechanisms and Frontiers of «Art» Expansion within the Urban Linguistic Landscape

Authors:
Abstract:

The study focuses on the morpheme «art» and the specifics of its functioning within the linguistic landscape of St. Petersburg. The subject of the study is the processes of semantic transformation (resemantization) of the «art» morpheme in the names of urban locations and spaces. The analysis of the linguistic landscape reveals an active transformation of the urban environment, where the traditional institutional concept of «iskusstvo» (fine arts) is consistently being replaced by a mobile and commercialized «art paradigm.» Based on the analysis of a corpus of 300 ergonyms, the article identifies an expansion of «art» against the indigenous element of urban nominations «iskusstvo.» The methodology employs a complex of approaches including descriptive method with linguistic observation, definitional, structural-semantic, communicative-pragmatic, and discursive analyses. Furthermore, the study utilizes the resources of the Russian National Corpus and field research techniques of the linguistic landscape, which makes it possible to record pragmatic shifts in the naming of urban objects. The study proposes a semantic typology of «art-nominations» (organic, connotative, and simulative types) and establishes a correlation between the density of the use of the morpheme under study and the nature of urban territories. It is determined that the resemantization of «art» is driven by a complex of factors: morphological (brevity and high word-formation activity of the lexeme), semantic (diffusion and vagueness of meaning), and sociocultural (demands of place branding and commodification). The paper argues that the expansion of «art» leads to its semantic devaluation and the emergence of linguistic simulacra. This process results in the changes in the classical «Petersburg text,» where aesthetic significance is replaced by marketing efficiency, which affects the traditional cultural codes of the city. The theoretical significance of the study lies in the substantiation of a shift in the urban linguistic landscape architecture from the «city-as-a-book» model to the «city-as-an-interface» one. It is concluded that in the linguistic landscape of a Russian city (using St. Petersburg as an example), the morpheme «art» serves as a tool of linguistic marketing, creating surplus symbolic capital under conditions of semantic devaluation of the term.

  • References

    1. Pavlenko A., Linguistic Landscape and other Sociolinguistic Methods in the Study of Russian Language Abroad, Russian Journal of Linguistics, 21 (3) (2017) 493–514. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-2-493-514

    2. Landry R., Bourhis R.Y., Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16 (1) (1997) 23–49. DOI: 10.1177/0261927X970161002

    3. Gorter D., Introduction: The Study of the Linguistic Landscape as a New Approach to Multilingualism, International Journal of Multilingualism, 3 (1) (2006) 1–6. DOI: 10.1080/14790710608668382

    4. Toporov V.N., Peterburgskiy tekst russkoy literatury: Izbrannyye trudy [The Petersburg Text of Russian Literature: Selected Works], Iskusstvo – SPB, St. Petersburg, 2003.

    5. Varlamova E.V., Gafiyatullina O.V., Kovylova D.D., Occasional Ergonyms of St. Petersburg and Kazan with English and English-Associated Components: Structure, Etymology, Communicative Stra-tegies, Global Scientific Potential, 12 (177) (2025) 293–297.

    6. Golomidova M.V., Razumov R.V., Goryayev S.O., Dmitriyeva A.V., Klimenko Ye.N., Lan L., Gorodskaya toponimiya: sovremennaya politika i praktika imenovaniya [Urban toponymy: modern policy and practice of naming], ed. by M.V. Golomidova, S.O. Goryayev, Ural University Publishing House, Yekaterinburg, 2023.

    7. Ilina N.O., Lyapidovskaya M.E., Busurina E.V., New Urbanonyms of St. Petersburg and Leningrad Region (2002–2024): Motivation, Classification, and Trends, Nauchnyi dialog, 14 (9) (2025) 48–67. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-9-48-67

    8. Shchukina K.A., Li Sh., Linguocultural Codes in Ergonyms of St. Petersburg (Based on the Na-mes of Restaurants in st. Petersburg), Litera, 3 (4) (2025) 191–201. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0749.2025.4.74-195

    9. Emikh T.A., Machkovskaya L.Ya., Names of Modern Apartment Complexes of Saint Petersburg through the Prism of Ethnocultural Value, Arkhont, 18(69) (2025) 289–299.

    10. Ivanova S.V., From high art to art: what the corpus reveals, Liberal Arts in Russia, 14 (4) (2025) 224–231. DOI: 10.15643/libartrus-2025.4.2

    11. Petrukhina Ye.V., Novyye yavleniya v russkom slovoobrazovanii [New phenomena in Russian word formation], Obrazovatelnyy portal Slovo [Educational portal Word]. Available at: https://portal-slovo.ru/philology/45939.php?sphrase_id=200655 (accessed 11.03.2026).

    12. Polezhayeva S.S., Yazykovoy element ART- i yego predstavleniye v sisteme yazyka i v publitsisticheskoy rechi [The linguistic element of ART and its representation in the language system and in journalistic speech], Fenomenologiya sovremennykh mediasistem i mediatekstov [Phenomenology of modern media systems and media texts:], Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Izd-vo Pridnestr. un-ta, Tiraspol, 2019, pp. 213–218.

    13. Backhaus P., Linguistic Landscapes: A Comparative Study of Urban Multilingualism in Tokyo. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, 2007.

    14. Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, ed. by A. Jaworski, C. Thurlow, Continuum, London, 2010.

    15. Pennycook A., Posthumanist applied linguistics, Routledge, London, 2017.

    16. Chernyavskaya V.E., Typography as Social Index: Soviet Landscape in the Modern Russian Discourse, Praxema. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2 (36) (2023) 50–73. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2023-2-50-73

    17. Chernyavskaya V.E., Typographic Landscape: Pragmatics of Typographic Variation, Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 22 (5) (2023) 89–100. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.5.6

    18. The Handbook of Linguistic Landscapes and Multilingualism, ed. by D. Gorter, J. Cenoz, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, 2025. DOI: 10.1002/9781394231805

    19. Chernyavskaya V.E., Zharkynbekova S.K., Code switching patterns in Kazakh-Russian hybrid language practice: An empirical study. Training, Language and Culture, 8 (2) (2024) 9–19. DOI: 10.22363/2521-442X-2024-8-2-9-19

    20. Efimova A.V., Savvina I.S., The image of the city in German lyric poetry of the Expressionist era, Terra Linguistica, 14 (4) (2023) 39–51. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.14403

    21. Androutsopoulos J., Digital linguistic landscapes, Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multilingualism and the social world, ed. by M. Pütz, N. Mundt, Multilingual Matters, Bris-tol, 2021, pp. 50–70.

    22. Yang Z., Zhang L.J., Examining the impact of digital linguistic landscapes on students’ motivation, and self-perceived achievement in second language writing, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36 (1) (2025) 652–666. DOI: 10.1111/ijal.12801.

    23. Shohamy E., Gorter D., Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, Routledge, 2009. DOI: 10.4324/9780203930960

    24. Shapiro R., Heinich N., When is artification?, Contemporary Aesthetics, 4 (2012) 1–11.

    25. Papen U., Commercial discourses, gentrification and citizens’ protest: The linguistic landscape of Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16 (1) (2012) 56–80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00518.x

    26. Vandenbroucke M., Socio-economic stratification of English in globalized landscapes: A market-oriented perspective, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20 (1) (2016) 86–108. DOI: 10.1111/josl.12166

    27. Landry C., The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators, Earthscan, 2000.

    28. Florida R., The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life, Basic Books, New York, 2002.

    29. Blommaert J., Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Comp-lexity, Multilingual Matters, Bristol, 2013. DOI: 10.21832/9781783090419

    30. Baudrillard J., Simulacra and simulation, trans. by S.F. Glaser, University of Michigan Press, 1994. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.9904

    31. Kress G., Van Leeuwen T., Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd ed., Routledge, London, New York, 2006.

    32. Scollon R., Scollon S.W., Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World, Routledge, London, New York, 2003. DOI: 10.4324/9780203422724

    33. Popova T.V., New phenomena in Russian word formation of the late XX – early XXI centuries, Philological Class. 12 (2024) 42–47.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article