The Semiotic Intensity Approach: A Scoping Review of Amplification and Attenuation Mechanisms in Multimodal Media Discourse

Review articles
Authors:
Abstract:

In the context of global communication, the construction of national images in the media has evolved from passive reporting to active meaning modulation. Using China as a case study, this research introduces the Semiotic Intensity Approach (SIA) to quantify how news media integrate verbal, visual, and layout resources to either amplify or attenuate specific narratives. By conceptualizing media discourse as a communicative event, this study conducts a systematic scoping review of a corpus of 56 core studies to construct a unified taxonomy of bias. The synthesis identifies 25 distinct cross-modal mechanisms (14 amplifying and 11 attenuating) that systematically deviate from a standard journalistic factual register. The analysis reveals a quantitative chasm in existing scholarship: while high-arousal amplification strategies dominate academic attention (70.2%), the equally strategic quiet mechanisms of attenuation (29.8%), such as spatial relegation or intersemiotic decoupling, remain under-theorized. The framework demonstrates how intersemiotic synergy acts as a multiplier effect to lock in preferred readings, whereas modal dissonance is frequently deployed to structurally suppress cooperative or positive narratives. The SIA reconceptualizes abstract framing concepts into operationalized metrics, serving as a diagnostic tool for researchers and educators to decode the anatomy of bias. This study establishes a foundation for reproducible, cross-cultural media analysis and highlights the theoretical necessity of moving beyond bias diagnosis toward the active restoration of narrative complexity.

  • References

    1. Yin Z., Constructing China’s Image in the British Media during International Crises: A Case Study of The Times Newspaper since February 2022, Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 19 (2) (2025) 130–142. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2025-2-130-142

    2. Bateman J.A., Wildfeuer J., A multimodal discourse theory of visual narrative, Journal of Pragmatics, 74 (2014) 180–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.001

    3. Machin D., Mayr A., How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, 2023. DOI: 10.4135/9781036212933

    4. Zykova I.V., Parameters of pragmatic analysis of phraseology in multimodal discourse (the case study of feature films), Terra Linguistica, 16 (3) (2025) 46–65. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.16304

    5. McCombs M.E., Shaw D.L., The agenda-setting function of mass media, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36 (2) (1972) 176–187. DOI: 10.1086/267990

    6. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. by C. Jewitt, 1st ed., Routledge, London, New York, 2009.

    7. Kress G., Van Leeuwen T., Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 3rd ed., Routledge, London, 2021. DOI: 10.4324/9781003099857

    8. Entman R.M., Framing: towards clarification of a fractured paradigm, McQuail’s Reader in Mass Communication Theory, ed. by D. McQuail, SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, 1993, pp. 390–397.

    9. Martin J.R., White P.R., The Language of Evaluation, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2005. DOI: 10.1057/9780230511910

    10. Bateman J., Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimo-dal Documents, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2008. DOI: 10.1057/9780230582323

    11. Liu Y., O’Halloran K.L., Intersemiotic Texture: analyzing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics, 19 (4) (2009) 367–388. DOI: 10.1080/10350330903361059

    12. Bednarek M., Caple H., Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond, Discourse & Society, 25 (2) (2014) 135–158. DOI: 10.1177/0957926513516041

    13. Arksey H., O’Malley L., Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework, Internatio-nal Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8 (1) (2005) 19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616

    14. Levac D., Colquhoun H., O’Brien K.K., Scoping studies: advancing the methodology, Implementation Science, 5 (1) (2010) 69. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

    15. Munn Z., Peters M.D.J., Stern C., Tufanaru C., McArthur A., Aromataris., Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18 (1) (2018) 143. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

    16. Tricco A.C., Lillie E., Zarin W., O’Brien K.K., et al., PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation, Annals of Internal Medicine, 169 (7) (2018) 467–473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850

    17. Braun V., Clarke V., Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11 (4) (2019) 589–597. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

    18. Zielinska D., The selective mode of language use and the quantized communicative field, Jour-nal of Pragmatics, 39 (5) (2007) 813–830. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.006

    19. Bateman J.A., Multimodality and genre, Information Design, Routledge, London, 2017, pp. 237–258. DOI: 10.4324/9781315585680

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article