Kazakh Folklore and Children’s Texts: Pragmatic and Semantic Transformations of Narrative in Didactic Practice

Authors:
Abstract:

This article examines how structural-semantic transformations reorganize cohesion, causal coherence, event sequence, and narrative functions in Kazakh folklore-didactic and children’s narratives. While level-based textual modification is commonly described in terms of lexical, syntactic, and quantitative simplification, less attention has been paid to how individual transformations affect referential continuity, causal recoverability, genre framing, characterization, and the overall pragmatic effect of a narrative. The study therefore aims to determine how these textual relations and functions change under two degrees of transformation, represented by A1 and A2 versions, and which components remain invariant in coherent transformed narratives. The corpus comprised eight Kazakh source narratives and sixteen purpose-built A1 and A2 versions, organized into eight aligned original-A1-A2 sequences. A total of 612 transformational segments were analyzed using a two-level coding model that distinguished six primary operations — structural compression, syntactic simplification, lexical substitution, semantic reduction, causal explication, and neutralization of imagery from their effects on textual organization. Preservation of the functional narrative core was treated as a control category of functional continuity. The findings show that A1 transformation relies more strongly on compression, syntactic redistribution, repeated reference, and a linear event sequence, whereas A2 retains a denser network of source-text relations and more frequently makes causal connections explicit. Syntactic splitting shifts cohesive relations from intra-sentential structures to inter-sentential linkage, while causal explication compensates for contextual relations weakened by compression. Genre framing, characterization, and conflict presentation may be reduced or recast without disrupting the central event structure. Macro-level coherence depends on the recoverability of the functional chain linking the principal participant, key event, motive or causal relation, plot resolution, and the narrative’s overall pragmatic effect. The proposed model contributes to the linguistic analysis of transformed narratives by relating formal operations to their consequences for cohesion, causal coherence, event sequence, and narrative function.

  • References

    [1] Alva-Manchego F., Scarton C., Specia L., Data-Driven Sentence Simplification: Survey and Benchmark, Computational Linguistics, 46 (1) (2020) 135–187. DOI: 10.1162/coli_a_00370

    [2] Cripwell L., Legrand J., Gardent C., Document-Level Planning for Text Simplification, Proce-edings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguis-tics (EACL 2023), (2023) 993–1006. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.70

    [3] Agrawal S., Carpuat M., Do Text Simplification Systems Preserve Meaning? A Human Evalua-tion via Reading Comprehension, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 12 (2024) 432–448. DOI: 10.1162/tacl_a_00653

    [4] Scholman M.C.J., Demberg V., Sanders T.J.M., Descriptively Adequate and Cognitively Plausi-ble? Validating Distinctions between Types of Coherence Relations, Discours, 30 (2022) 1–33. DOI: 10.4000/discours.12075

    [5] Mulder G., Sanders T.J.M., Causal coherence relations and levels of discourse representation, Discourse Processes, 49 (6) (2012) 501–522. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2012.692655

    [6] Cevasco J., Acosta Buralli K., Construction of coherence in the comprehension of narratives: Studies on the importance of the establishment of causal connections, gaps in current research and future directions, Psychologist Papers, 44 (1) (2023) 45–54. DOI: 10.23923/pap.psicol.3010

    [7] North K., Ranasinghe T., Shardlow M., Zampieri M., Deep learning approaches to lexical simplification: A survey, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 63 (1) (2025) 111–134. DOI: 10.1007/s10844-024-00882-9

    [8] Tyshchenko O., Figedyová M., The image base of fairy-tale formula in the structure of folklore text (based on Russian, Slovak, and Czech fairy tales and their translations), Slavistica Vilnensis, 68 (2) (2023) 115–127. DOI: 10.15388/SlavViln.2023.68(2).9

    [9] Council of Europe, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment – Companion Volume, Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2020. 280 p.

    [10] Iskakova Z., Demessinova L., Zinedina A., Yesbossyn L., Ospanova D., Zhumabay M., Yerbaty-rova Z., The significance of the lexical-grammatical minimum in teaching Kazakh at the A2 level, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15 (10) (2025) 3477–3488. DOI: 10.17507/tpls.1510.36

    [11] Cardon R., Bibal A., On operations in automatic text simplification, Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Text Simplification, Accessibility and Readability, (2023) 116–130.

    [12] Vásquez-Rodríguez L., Shardlow M., Przybyła P., Ananiadou S., Document-level text simpli-fication with coherence evaluation, Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Text Simplification, Ac-cessibility and Readability, (2023) 85–101.

    [13] Grubišić A., Žitko B., Gašpar A., Vasić D., Dodaj A., Evaluation of split-and-rephrase output of the knowledge extraction tool in the intelligent tutoring system, Expert Systems with Applications, 187 (2022) 115900. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115900

    [14] Schomacker T., Dönicke T., Tropmann-Frick M., Exploring automatic text simplification of German narrative documents, Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2023), (2023) 139–148. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2312.09907

    [15] Farajidizaji A., Raina V., Gales M., Is it possible to modify text to a target readability level? An initial investigation using zero-shot large language models, Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024), (2024) 9325–9339. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.12551

    [16] Burmakina N.G., Automated text simplification in the field of inclusive social addressing, Ter-ra Linguistica, 15 (3) (2024) 7–14. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.15301

    [17] Díaz-Negrillo A., Espinola Rosillo M.C., Mode of production and (referential) cohesion: An L2 English corpus-based study of syntactic coordination, System, 121 (2024) 103247. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103247

    [18] Truică C.-O., Stan A.-I., Apostol E.-S., SimpLex: a lexical text simplification architecture, Neural Computing and Applications, 35 (8) (2023) 6265–6280. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-022-07905-y

    [19] Graichen E., Jönsson A., Context-aware Swedish lexical simplification, Proceedings of the Se-cond Workshop on Text Simplification, Accessibility and Readability, (2023) 11–20.

    [20] Ortiz-Zambrano J.A., Espín-Riofrío C.H., Montejo-Ráez A., Deep encodings vs. linguistic features in lexical complexity prediction, Neural Computing and Applications, 37 (2025) 1171–1187. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-024-10662-9

    [21] Tokpayeva L.S., Kuzembayeva G.A., Spulber D.P., A comparative lexical analysis of Kazakh, Russian and English children’s folklore, RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Seman-tics, 15 (1) (2024) 107–125. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2024-15-1-107-125

    [22] Tileubay G.K., Joldasbekova B.U., Tattimbetova K.O., Semiotics of objects in a modern Kazakhstani story // RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 15 (4) (2024) 1390–1402. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2024-15-4-1390-1402

    [23] Zwaan R.A., Comprehension: from clause to conspiracy narrative, Discourse Processes, 61 (4–5) (2024) 166–179. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2024.2327271

    [24] Espinosa-Zaragoza I., Abreu-Salas J., Lloret E., Moreda P., Palomar M., A review of research-based automatic text simplification tools, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, (2023) 321–330.

    [25] Veitsman Y., Hartmann M., Recent advancements and challenges of Turkic Central Asian language processing, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Language Models for Low-Resource Languages, (2025) 309–324.

    [26] Karagöz E., Closing formulae in tales: The case of Idel-Ural (Tatar) tales, Motif Academy Jour-nal of Folklore, 14 (36) (2021) 1207–1226. DOI: 10.12981/mahder.1016619

    [27] Bakker J., Kamps J., Beyond sentence-level text simplification: Reproducibility study of context-aware document simplification, Proceedings of the Workshop on DeTermIt! Evaluating Text Dif-ficulty in a Multilingual Context @ LREC-COLING 2024, (2024) 27–38.

    [28] Cripwell L., Legrand J., Gardent C., Evaluating document simplification: On the importance of separately assessing simplicity and meaning preservation, Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Tools and Resources for People with REAding DIfficulties (READI) @ LREC-COLING 2024, (2024) 1–14.

    [29] Maddela M., Alva-Manchego F., Adapting sentence-level automatic metrics for document-level simplification evaluation, Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 1 (2025) 6444–6459. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.327

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article